When HR managers at the recent SHRM conference in Chicago were asked what their most challenging problem is, virtually all responded, "Finding and keeping good people."
How can you locate and hold on to top performers in a tricky economy with a diminishing number of qualified candidates? Many experts suggest that so-called "passive" candidates are the secret. Blogging on CIOUpdate.com, David Bair, vice president for Flex for Kforce Technology Staffing, talks about attracting the passive candidate.
The passive candidate has long held a certain mystique?difficult to identify and even more difficult to recruit, Bair says. But still they are considered by many to be the gHoly Grailh of job candidates for two main reasons:
1. Because they are happily employed, passive candidates are thought to be loyal and more stable.
2. Because they are not actively seeking a new position, there will be less competition for their attention.
The challenge, he says, is that passive candidates are unlikely to respond to traditional recruitment techniques: They donft flock to job boards, and they donft spend their Sundays picking through help wanted ads.
Nevertheless, passive candidates are proactively managing their careers. They arenft averse to change if the right opportunity presents itself.
To Turn a Passive Prospect's Head
What might get a passive candidatefs attention? It could be a simple matter of timing?you catch them on a very bad day?or a change in circumstances such as a new manager who has negatively affected their quality of work life.
More often than not, Bair says, itfs an issue of long-term career goals. But when passive prospects feel their goals are not being met, they don't launch a traditional job search. Rather, they take a second look at an opportunity they had heard about previously, explore opportunities with a company they admire, or turn to a group of trusted colleagues.
Or, they call a recruiter that they have a relationship with. Maybe they met you at a professional meeting, or read your blog. Or maybe you've responded to theirs. But a pre-established relationship makes the difference.
Pooh!
Heather Hamilton, a staffing manager and Microsoft gemployee evangelist,h offers a somewhat different perspective in her One Louder blog:
Many people will tell you that passive candidates are better because the people looking for a job are not high quality. "Pooh!" Hamilton says. There are high quality active candidates, and there are low quality passive candidates, she warns. You know those people that aren't great performers but they fly under the radar? They're all in that passive candidate pool.
It's also a myth, she says, that it's hard to attract passive candidates because companies work hard to keep their best people. In fact, most companies don't even know who their best people are, she says, let alone have a retention strategy for them.
When it comes to recruiting the passive candidates, though, she believes that most recruiters get it wrong?they try to convert a passive candidate into an active candidate. The better approach, she says, agreeing with Bair, is to make sure that they know you and know how to reach you when they have a bad day.
In next issue of the Advisor, Hamilton's approach to "passive" candidate engagement and an introduction to the tool that helps with the compensation piece of the hiring process.
Attracting--and Compensating--the Coveted 'Passive' Candidates
by Steve Bruce